AMRK Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cipher Mining has a net margin of 0.33% compared to A-Mark Precious Metals's net margin of -359.95%. A-Mark Precious Metals's return on equity of 9.52% beat Cipher Mining's return on equity of -9.21%.

A-Mark Precious Metals has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 71.87%. On the other hand Cipher Mining has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 51.9%. Given that A-Mark Precious Metals has higher upside potential than Cipher Mining, analysts believe A-Mark Precious Metals is more attractive than Cipher Mining.

A-Mark Precious Metals has a beta of -0.057, which suggesting that the stock is 105.672% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cipher Mining has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

A-Mark Precious Metals has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.08%. Cipher Mining offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. A-Mark Precious Metals pays 61.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Cipher Mining pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. A-Mark Precious Metals's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

A-Mark Precious Metals quarterly revenues are $2.7B, which are larger than Cipher Mining quarterly revenues of $24.1M. A-Mark Precious Metals's net income of $9M is higher than Cipher Mining's net income of -$86.8M. Notably, A-Mark Precious Metals's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.68x while Cipher Mining's PE ratio is 65.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for A-Mark Precious Metals is 0.06x versus 10.93x for Cipher Mining. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Innventure has a net margin of 0.33% compared to A-Mark Precious Metals's net margin of -697.48%. A-Mark Precious Metals's return on equity of 9.52% beat Innventure's return on equity of --.

A-Mark Precious Metals has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 71.87%. On the other hand Innventure has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that A-Mark Precious Metals has higher upside potential than Innventure, analysts believe A-Mark Precious Metals is more attractive than Innventure.

A-Mark Precious Metals has a beta of -0.057, which suggesting that the stock is 105.672% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Innventure has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

A-Mark Precious Metals has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.08%. Innventure offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. A-Mark Precious Metals pays 61.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Innventure pays out -0.78% of its earnings as a dividend. A-Mark Precious Metals's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

A-Mark Precious Metals quarterly revenues are $2.7B, which are larger than Innventure quarterly revenues of $317K. A-Mark Precious Metals's net income of $9M is higher than Innventure's net income of -$2.2M. Notably, A-Mark Precious Metals's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.68x while Innventure's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for A-Mark Precious Metals is 0.06x versus 593.84x for Innventure. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

OFS Capital has a net margin of 0.33% compared to A-Mark Precious Metals's net margin of 64.72%. A-Mark Precious Metals's return on equity of 9.52% beat OFS Capital's return on equity of -0.73%.

A-Mark Precious Metals has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 71.87%. On the other hand OFS Capital has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 11.94%. Given that A-Mark Precious Metals has higher upside potential than OFS Capital, analysts believe A-Mark Precious Metals is more attractive than OFS Capital.

A-Mark Precious Metals has a beta of -0.057, which suggesting that the stock is 105.672% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison OFS Capital has a beta of 1.770, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 77.047%.

A-Mark Precious Metals has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.08%. OFS Capital offers a yield of 16.92% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. A-Mark Precious Metals pays 61.05% of its earnings as a dividend. OFS Capital pays out -3861.08% of its earnings as a dividend. A-Mark Precious Metals's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

A-Mark Precious Metals quarterly revenues are $2.7B, which are larger than OFS Capital quarterly revenues of $2.6M. A-Mark Precious Metals's net income of $9M is higher than OFS Capital's net income of $1.7M. Notably, A-Mark Precious Metals's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.68x while OFS Capital's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for A-Mark Precious Metals is 0.06x versus 30.96x for OFS Capital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Riot Platforms has a net margin of 0.33% compared to A-Mark Precious Metals's net margin of -182.06%. A-Mark Precious Metals's return on equity of 9.52% beat Riot Platforms's return on equity of 0.56%.

A-Mark Precious Metals has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 71.87%. On the other hand Riot Platforms has an analysts' consensus of $17.90 which suggests that it could grow by 53.39%. Given that A-Mark Precious Metals has higher upside potential than Riot Platforms, analysts believe A-Mark Precious Metals is more attractive than Riot Platforms.

A-Mark Precious Metals has a beta of -0.057, which suggesting that the stock is 105.672% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Riot Platforms has a beta of 4.145, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 314.543%.

A-Mark Precious Metals has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.08%. Riot Platforms offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. A-Mark Precious Metals pays 61.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Riot Platforms pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. A-Mark Precious Metals's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

A-Mark Precious Metals quarterly revenues are $2.7B, which are larger than Riot Platforms quarterly revenues of $84.8M. A-Mark Precious Metals's net income of $9M is higher than Riot Platforms's net income of -$154.4M. Notably, A-Mark Precious Metals's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.68x while Riot Platforms's PE ratio is 58.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for A-Mark Precious Metals is 0.06x versus 9.39x for Riot Platforms. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.