AMRK Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

BGC Group, Inc. has a net margin of -0.03% compared to A-Mark Precious Metals, Inc.'s net margin of 3.54%. A-Mark Precious Metals, Inc.'s return on equity of 0.94% beat BGC Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 14.41%.

A-Mark Precious Metals, Inc. has a consensus price target of $41.75, signalling upside risk potential of 42.74%. On the other hand BGC Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $14.50 which suggests that it could grow by 64.96%. Given that BGC Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than A-Mark Precious Metals, Inc., analysts believe BGC Group, Inc. is more attractive than A-Mark Precious Metals, Inc..

A-Mark Precious Metals, Inc. has a beta of 0.354, which suggesting that the stock is 64.633% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BGC Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.055, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.547%.

A-Mark Precious Metals, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.74%. BGC Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. A-Mark Precious Metals, Inc. pays 112.9% of its earnings as a dividend. BGC Group, Inc. pays out 27.66% of its earnings as a dividend. BGC Group, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but A-Mark Precious Metals, Inc.'s is not.

A-Mark Precious Metals, Inc. quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are larger than BGC Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $736.4M. A-Mark Precious Metals, Inc.'s net income of -$971K is lower than BGC Group, Inc.'s net income of $26.1M. Notably, A-Mark Precious Metals, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 99.76x while BGC Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 26.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for A-Mark Precious Metals, Inc. is 0.06x versus 1.54x for BGC Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

BitMine Immersion Technologies has a net margin of -0.03% compared to A-Mark Precious Metals, Inc.'s net margin of -76.24%. A-Mark Precious Metals, Inc.'s return on equity of 0.94% beat BitMine Immersion Technologies's return on equity of -88.47%.

A-Mark Precious Metals, Inc. has a consensus price target of $41.75, signalling upside risk potential of 42.74%. On the other hand BitMine Immersion Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that A-Mark Precious Metals, Inc. has higher upside potential than BitMine Immersion Technologies, analysts believe A-Mark Precious Metals, Inc. is more attractive than BitMine Immersion Technologies.

A-Mark Precious Metals, Inc. has a beta of 0.354, which suggesting that the stock is 64.633% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BitMine Immersion Technologies has a beta of 0.568, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.17%.

A-Mark Precious Metals, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.74%. BitMine Immersion Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. A-Mark Precious Metals, Inc. pays 112.9% of its earnings as a dividend. BitMine Immersion Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

A-Mark Precious Metals, Inc. quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are larger than BitMine Immersion Technologies quarterly revenues of $1.5M. A-Mark Precious Metals, Inc.'s net income of -$971K is higher than BitMine Immersion Technologies's net income of -$1.2M. Notably, A-Mark Precious Metals, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 99.76x while BitMine Immersion Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for A-Mark Precious Metals, Inc. is 0.06x versus 4.04x for BitMine Immersion Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cipher Mining, Inc. has a net margin of -0.03% compared to A-Mark Precious Metals, Inc.'s net margin of -4.58%. A-Mark Precious Metals, Inc.'s return on equity of 0.94% beat Cipher Mining, Inc.'s return on equity of -9.74%.

A-Mark Precious Metals, Inc. has a consensus price target of $41.75, signalling upside risk potential of 42.74%. On the other hand Cipher Mining, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $27.25 which suggests that it could grow by 41.34%. Given that A-Mark Precious Metals, Inc. has higher upside potential than Cipher Mining, Inc., analysts believe A-Mark Precious Metals, Inc. is more attractive than Cipher Mining, Inc..

A-Mark Precious Metals, Inc. has a beta of 0.354, which suggesting that the stock is 64.633% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cipher Mining, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

A-Mark Precious Metals, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.74%. Cipher Mining, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. A-Mark Precious Metals, Inc. pays 112.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Cipher Mining, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

A-Mark Precious Metals, Inc. quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are larger than Cipher Mining, Inc. quarterly revenues of $71.7M. A-Mark Precious Metals, Inc.'s net income of -$971K is higher than Cipher Mining, Inc.'s net income of -$3.3M. Notably, A-Mark Precious Metals, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 99.76x while Cipher Mining, Inc.'s PE ratio is 58.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for A-Mark Precious Metals, Inc. is 0.06x versus 34.86x for Cipher Mining, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Riot Platforms, Inc. has a net margin of -0.03% compared to A-Mark Precious Metals, Inc.'s net margin of 57.97%. A-Mark Precious Metals, Inc.'s return on equity of 0.94% beat Riot Platforms, Inc.'s return on equity of 5.24%.

A-Mark Precious Metals, Inc. has a consensus price target of $41.75, signalling upside risk potential of 42.74%. On the other hand Riot Platforms, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $26.89 which suggests that it could grow by 80.02%. Given that Riot Platforms, Inc. has higher upside potential than A-Mark Precious Metals, Inc., analysts believe Riot Platforms, Inc. is more attractive than A-Mark Precious Metals, Inc..

A-Mark Precious Metals, Inc. has a beta of 0.354, which suggesting that the stock is 64.633% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Riot Platforms, Inc. has a beta of 3.841, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 284.068%.

A-Mark Precious Metals, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.74%. Riot Platforms, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. A-Mark Precious Metals, Inc. pays 112.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Riot Platforms, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

A-Mark Precious Metals, Inc. quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are larger than Riot Platforms, Inc. quarterly revenues of $180.2M. A-Mark Precious Metals, Inc.'s net income of -$971K is lower than Riot Platforms, Inc.'s net income of $104.5M. Notably, A-Mark Precious Metals, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 99.76x while Riot Platforms, Inc.'s PE ratio is 44.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for A-Mark Precious Metals, Inc. is 0.06x versus 8.56x for Riot Platforms, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.