AGRI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cal-Maine Foods has a net margin of -10243.49% compared to AgriFORCE Growing Systems's net margin of 17.67%. AgriFORCE Growing Systems's return on equity of -- beat Cal-Maine Foods's return on equity of 16.61%.

AgriFORCE Growing Systems has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 402314.49%. On the other hand Cal-Maine Foods has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -16.42%. Given that AgriFORCE Growing Systems has higher upside potential than Cal-Maine Foods, analysts believe AgriFORCE Growing Systems is more attractive than Cal-Maine Foods.

AgriFORCE Growing Systems has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cal-Maine Foods has a beta of -0.102, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 110.214%.

AgriFORCE Growing Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cal-Maine Foods offers a yield of 2.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.02 per share. AgriFORCE Growing Systems pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cal-Maine Foods pays out 33.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Cal-Maine Foods's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AgriFORCE Growing Systems quarterly revenues are $41.3K, which are smaller than Cal-Maine Foods quarterly revenues of $640.8M. AgriFORCE Growing Systems's net income of -$5.8M is lower than Cal-Maine Foods's net income of $113.2M. Notably, AgriFORCE Growing Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Cal-Maine Foods's PE ratio is 11.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AgriFORCE Growing Systems is -- versus 1.90x for Cal-Maine Foods. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Global Seafood Technologies has a net margin of -10243.49% compared to AgriFORCE Growing Systems's net margin of --. AgriFORCE Growing Systems's return on equity of -- beat Global Seafood Technologies's return on equity of --.

AgriFORCE Growing Systems has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 402314.49%. On the other hand Global Seafood Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that AgriFORCE Growing Systems has higher upside potential than Global Seafood Technologies, analysts believe AgriFORCE Growing Systems is more attractive than Global Seafood Technologies.

AgriFORCE Growing Systems has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global Seafood Technologies has a beta of 0.082, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 91.802%.

AgriFORCE Growing Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Global Seafood Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AgriFORCE Growing Systems pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global Seafood Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

AgriFORCE Growing Systems quarterly revenues are $41.3K, which are larger than Global Seafood Technologies quarterly revenues of --. AgriFORCE Growing Systems's net income of -$5.8M is higher than Global Seafood Technologies's net income of --. Notably, AgriFORCE Growing Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global Seafood Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AgriFORCE Growing Systems is -- versus -- for Global Seafood Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Village Farms International has a net margin of -10243.49% compared to AgriFORCE Growing Systems's net margin of -0.98%. AgriFORCE Growing Systems's return on equity of -- beat Village Farms International's return on equity of -16.15%.

AgriFORCE Growing Systems has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 402314.49%. On the other hand Village Farms International has an analysts' consensus of $2.28 which suggests that it could grow by 195.41%. Given that AgriFORCE Growing Systems has higher upside potential than Village Farms International, analysts believe AgriFORCE Growing Systems is more attractive than Village Farms International.

AgriFORCE Growing Systems has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Village Farms International has a beta of 2.189, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 118.903%.

AgriFORCE Growing Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Village Farms International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AgriFORCE Growing Systems pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Village Farms International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

AgriFORCE Growing Systems quarterly revenues are $41.3K, which are smaller than Village Farms International quarterly revenues of $83.4M. AgriFORCE Growing Systems's net income of -$5.8M is lower than Village Farms International's net income of -$820K. Notably, AgriFORCE Growing Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Village Farms International's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AgriFORCE Growing Systems is -- versus 0.26x for Village Farms International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Zalemark Holding has a net margin of -10243.49% compared to AgriFORCE Growing Systems's net margin of --. AgriFORCE Growing Systems's return on equity of -- beat Zalemark Holding's return on equity of --.

AgriFORCE Growing Systems has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 402314.49%. On the other hand Zalemark Holding has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that AgriFORCE Growing Systems has higher upside potential than Zalemark Holding, analysts believe AgriFORCE Growing Systems is more attractive than Zalemark Holding.

AgriFORCE Growing Systems has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zalemark Holding has a beta of -0.161, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 116.11%.

AgriFORCE Growing Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Zalemark Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AgriFORCE Growing Systems pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Zalemark Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

AgriFORCE Growing Systems quarterly revenues are $41.3K, which are larger than Zalemark Holding quarterly revenues of --. AgriFORCE Growing Systems's net income of -$5.8M is higher than Zalemark Holding's net income of --. Notably, AgriFORCE Growing Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Zalemark Holding's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AgriFORCE Growing Systems is -- versus -- for Zalemark Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.