ADN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Enovix has a net margin of -14470.31% compared to Advent Technologies Holdings's net margin of -385.56%. Advent Technologies Holdings's return on equity of -1041.26% beat Enovix's return on equity of -102.33%.

Advent Technologies Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 536.79%. On the other hand Enovix has an analysts' consensus of $26.91 which suggests that it could grow by 325.78%. Given that Advent Technologies Holdings has higher upside potential than Enovix, analysts believe Advent Technologies Holdings is more attractive than Enovix.

Advent Technologies Holdings has a beta of 0.582, which suggesting that the stock is 41.754% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Enovix has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Advent Technologies Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Enovix offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Advent Technologies Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Enovix pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Advent Technologies Holdings quarterly revenues are $128K, which are smaller than Enovix quarterly revenues of $9.7M. Advent Technologies Holdings's net income of -$18.5M is higher than Enovix's net income of -$37.5M. Notably, Advent Technologies Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Enovix's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Advent Technologies Holdings is 0.59x versus 47.96x for Enovix. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ideal Power has a net margin of -14470.31% compared to Advent Technologies Holdings's net margin of -47998.78%. Advent Technologies Holdings's return on equity of -1041.26% beat Ideal Power's return on equity of -57.04%.

Advent Technologies Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 536.79%. On the other hand Ideal Power has an analysts' consensus of $4.20 which suggests that it could fall by -19.08%. Given that Advent Technologies Holdings has higher upside potential than Ideal Power, analysts believe Advent Technologies Holdings is more attractive than Ideal Power.

Advent Technologies Holdings has a beta of 0.582, which suggesting that the stock is 41.754% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ideal Power has a beta of 1.052, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.241%.

Advent Technologies Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ideal Power offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Advent Technologies Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ideal Power pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Advent Technologies Holdings quarterly revenues are $128K, which are larger than Ideal Power quarterly revenues of $5.4K. Advent Technologies Holdings's net income of -$18.5M is lower than Ideal Power's net income of -$2.6M. Notably, Advent Technologies Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ideal Power's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Advent Technologies Holdings is 0.59x versus 480.97x for Ideal Power. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Plug Power has a net margin of -14470.31% compared to Advent Technologies Holdings's net margin of -697.46%. Advent Technologies Holdings's return on equity of -1041.26% beat Plug Power's return on equity of -77.08%.

Advent Technologies Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 536.79%. On the other hand Plug Power has an analysts' consensus of $2.15 which suggests that it could grow by 155.74%. Given that Advent Technologies Holdings has higher upside potential than Plug Power, analysts believe Advent Technologies Holdings is more attractive than Plug Power.

Advent Technologies Holdings has a beta of 0.582, which suggesting that the stock is 41.754% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Plug Power has a beta of 2.070, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 107.009%.

Advent Technologies Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Plug Power offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Advent Technologies Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Plug Power pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Advent Technologies Holdings quarterly revenues are $128K, which are smaller than Plug Power quarterly revenues of $191.5M. Advent Technologies Holdings's net income of -$18.5M is higher than Plug Power's net income of -$1.3B. Notably, Advent Technologies Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Plug Power's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Advent Technologies Holdings is 0.59x versus 1.05x for Plug Power. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ultralife has a net margin of -14470.31% compared to Advent Technologies Holdings's net margin of 0.72%. Advent Technologies Holdings's return on equity of -1041.26% beat Ultralife's return on equity of 6.98%.

Advent Technologies Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 536.79%. On the other hand Ultralife has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 215.32%. Given that Advent Technologies Holdings has higher upside potential than Ultralife, analysts believe Advent Technologies Holdings is more attractive than Ultralife.

Advent Technologies Holdings has a beta of 0.582, which suggesting that the stock is 41.754% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ultralife has a beta of 0.959, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.121%.

Advent Technologies Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ultralife offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Advent Technologies Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ultralife pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Advent Technologies Holdings quarterly revenues are $128K, which are smaller than Ultralife quarterly revenues of $35.7M. Advent Technologies Holdings's net income of -$18.5M is lower than Ultralife's net income of $258K. Notably, Advent Technologies Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ultralife's PE ratio is 11.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Advent Technologies Holdings is 0.59x versus 0.45x for Ultralife. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.