SoFi Technologies gets a lot of headlines as a digital bank disrupting the traditional giants like JP Morgan Chase and Bank of America but Warren Buffett’s Nu Holdings may be where the focus should be.
Nu Holdings and SoFi Technologies are both leaders in the digital financial services space but offer very distinct approaches to transforming finance.
Nu Holdings has a primary focus in Latin America, especially Brazil, whereas SoFi is laser-focus on the US. This difference in geography might initially have you assume that SoFi is tapping into a wealthier market and can squeeze out more revenues and greater profits, but is that really the case?
What Makes Nu So Special?
Nu Holdings is a digital-first finance firm that initially entering the market as a credit card provider before broadening its product offerings to include payments, personal loans, and insurance.
By targeting the large unbanked and underbanked populations across Latin America, NU has seen rapid customer acquisition with low overheads, which as you’ll see are evident in its financials.
The focus on lean digital services has allowed NU to operate at significantly lower costs than many of its competitors.
On the other hand, SoFi began as a student loan refinancing platform and has since grown into a one-stop shop for financial services, including personal and home loans, investments, and banking services.
While SoFi’s “super-app” approach is designed to provide value through convenience, it also comes with higher operational complexity and costs.
How Do NU and SoFi Compare?
When it comes to the nitty gritty of the financials, Nu Holdings’ has been nothing short of remarkable.
In Q2 2024, management reported a 76.4% year-over-year revenue increase, largely fueled by demand for digital banking solutions in Brazil, where traditional banking services remain inaccessible or costly for many.
Notably, this follows two other quarters of year-over-year growth in excess of this as well as 9 prior quarters of 100%+ quarterly growth.
SoFi’s Q2 2024 growth, while strong, came in at a lower 20.9% year-over-year increase. SoFi’s growth has benefited from its U.S. bank charter, obtained in early 2022, which supports a range of financial services but its top line remains heavily tied to interest income from loans, which introduces greater exposure to credit risk.
Profitability also tells an interesting story that has likely wooed Warren Buffett and his investment lieutenants at Berkshire Hathaway.
Nu Holdings reached profitability much faster than most financial technology firms, reporting a net profit of approximately $141 million in Q1 2023 and last quarter that figure skyrocketed to $487 million, suggesting a highly scalable model is in place and working well.
How Is Nu Able To Scale So Well?
NU’s focus on high-volume, low-cost digital banking, combined with the cost advantages of operating in Brazil, where labor and infrastructure are cheaper, have accelerated its path to profitability.
SoFi, meanwhile, only swung to profitability 3 quarters ago and last quarter posted just $17 million of net income.
Although it reported a narrowing loss of around $47 million in Q2 2023 and profit of $47 million two quarters later, the company had headwinds in the way of high customer acquisition costs and significant investment in infrastructure to support its range of services.
With that said, one supportive tailwind for SoFi is its bank charter that has helped to boost margins via deposit gathering. Nevertheless, SoFi’s reliance on lending products adds an element of credit risk that NU, with its emphasis on non-credit services, largely avoids.
Why Can Nu Be So Much More Efficient?
Nu Holdings benefits from its focus on Brazil’s cost-effective market, where it achieves economies of scale with a cost-to-income ratio significantly lower than its U.S.-based peers.
SoFi’s model that spans student loans, savings accounts and credit cards, is inherently more costly because heavy competition demands substantial marketing expenditures.
That broad suite of offerings by SoFi further requires a whole lot of investment in infrastructure and regulatory compliance, weighing on its cost structure and delaying its profitability timeline compared to NU.
And then there is the difference in customer base and market focus. NU’s appeal lies in its reach within underserved Latin American markets, where it has built a loyal customer base by addressing the needs of the unbanked. In Brazil, Nu is seen as a trusted provider in a high-growth region with relatively low competition.
On the other hand, SoFi must stare down stiff competition, where its broad financial services offerings need to stand out in a crowded field. The competitive U.S. market also drives higher customer acquisition costs, adding to SoFi’s already substantial operational expenses.
Why Does Nu Trade at a Premium To SoFi?
NU is valued at a premium relative to SOFI, thanks in part to its profitability and strong growth in an underserved market with high potential. Having grown at over 100% quarterly on a year-over-year basis for much of its life as a public company and with net income growth of 48.5% still forecast over the next 5 years, Nu is arguably cheap trading at a 48x price-to-earnings ratio.
Clearly, big money investors view NU’s model as lower-risk due to its limited exposure to credit risk and reliance on low-cost digital services.
To the contrary, SoFi’s valuation reflects investor caution around its path to profitability and the inherent risks of its loan-heavy revenue model, which is exposed to economic volatility in the U.S.
Nu vs SoFi Stock Which Is Best?
Nu Holdings stock appears to be the better bet given how much more efficiently it can drop revenues to bottom line profitability.
With a clear focus on accessible digital banking in Latin America, Nu has become a more profitable venture, with a lower-cost structure that has led to nearly half a billion in profits.
By contrast, SoFi’s ambitious “super-app” model has substantial growth potential but is in tandem anchored by greater costs and risks.
Nu Holdings’ leaner, focused approach in emerging markets has given it an edge in profitability, while SoFi’s broader U.S.-centric approach faces higher costs, lower profitability and more operating hurdles to overcome.
#1 Stock For The Next 7 Days
When Financhill publishes its #1 stock, listen up. After all, the #1 stock is the cream of the crop, even when markets crash.
Financhill just revealed its top stock for investors right now... so there's no better time to claim your slice of the pie.
See The #1 Stock Now >>The author has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. Financhill has a disclosure policy. This post may contain affiliate links or links from our sponsors.