If you strip away the buzzwords, Sinclair’s business is still built on two pools of money, distribution/retransmission fees from pay‑TV operators and advertising, mostly sold in local markets.
Both pools are losing volume even as Sinclair raises price. That’s the story in one line and it’s why the next few years will likely feel like running up a down escalator.
Where Does The Money Come From?
In 2024, Sinclair booked $1.746 billion of “distribution” revenue. Rate hikes helped, but subscriber losses more than nibbled at the gains. Management disclosed that 2024 saw high‑teens percentage increases in contract rates, offset by low double‑digit percentage subscriber declines. That’s classic “price up, units down.”
Advertising remains the other big leg. Last year, Sinclair’s own mix skewed about 30% local news, 17% network programming, and 16% sports of ad revenue (paid programming and “other” fill out the rest). The mix shows why national ad slowdowns aren’t the whole risk: if the local economy wobbles, Sinclair’s ad dollars feel it first.
U.S. pay‑TV providers lost roughly 5 million subscribers in 2023, and analysts said the base fell below ~60 million in early last year, down from about 100 million eight years earlier. That’s the denominator squeezing both retrans fees and ad reach.
One more headwind is distributors are starting to bundle streaming right into cable packages. The Disney–Charter deal in 2023 turned heads because Spectrum now includes Disney+ and ESPN+ with certain video tiers and will package ESPN’s future DTC service for subscribers. That’s a blueprint others can copy, and it dilutes leverage for station owners over time.
What’s Gone Unnoticed?
Sinclair doesn’t own as much “must‑have” sports as many think. Yes, it owns Tennis Channel and even launched the free, ad‑supported T2 channel, and it co‑owns Marquee Sports Network with the Chicago Cubs. But the old YES Network tie was through Diamond Sports (Bally/FanDuel RSNs).
After Diamond’s bankruptcy emergence at the start of the year, Sinclair disclosed it no longer holds an equity interest there. It does still provide management services to YES under a contract that can extend to 2029, fee income, not ownership. That nuance matters for valuation.
Sinclair’s own filing spells out that distribution revenue grew last year because of rate increases, but the sub decline in the low double digits offset a lot of that.
Political ad years mask the trajectory. 2024 set a record for U.S. political ad spend and broadcast still captured the biggest chunk, even as CTV surged. So “even years” can look deceptively strong for local TV.
Digital/adjacencies are real—but not yet needle‑moving. Sinclair has been building out ad‑tech and non‑broadcast revenue. In March 2025 it acquired the remaining 75% of Digital Remedy and in June rebranded its Compulse business under that name, pitching a “Rule of 40” software profile focused on omnichannel or CTV activation. That’s helpful, but not a replacement for shrinking linear yet.
NextGen TV is a akin to a call option because Sinclair co‑launched EdgeBeam Wireless with peer broadcasters to commercialize 3.0‑based data delivery, and it’s been investing through ONE Media 3.0 (including buying out SK Telecom’s stake in CAST.ERA in late 2024).
If datacasting, meaning software updates, automotive, IoT, emergency services monetizes at scale, it might well provide a new lane.
Bulls Vs Bears
Sinclair does enjoy negotiating leverage thanks to big station footprint + FCC exclusivity rules (network non‑duplication/syndicated exclusivity) still force MVPDs to strike local deals—they can’t just pipe in a distant ABC or FOX to replace Sinclair’s affiliate. That’s real, codified leverage.
Plus, the Tennis Channel programming depth is an asset. Sinclair says it carries a vast majority of global live tennis domestically and Marquee economics can travel better to streaming than local broadcast news.
Record political cycles keep returning, and 2026 won’t be an exception.
However, price increases are bumping into a shrinking subscriber base; eventually, units fall faster than rates rise.
Marketers keep shifting budgets to CTV and social, seeking precision and scale. Local TV still gets a large bite in election years, but the trend line points digital.
And deals like Disney–Charter show national networks can go over the top (and even bundle with cable), reducing the indispensability of local affiliates over time.
Better Runway But Storms Ahead?
Sinclair cleaned up some near‑term risk while leverage remains a watch‑item.
After a “comprehensive refinancing,” management says the closest material maturity now sits at the end of 2029. Sinclair even repurchased a slug of 2027 notes at a discount in Q2’25. That’s breathing room.
The board resumed quarterly dividends at $0.25 per share (declared again Aug. 6, 2025), after earlier pauses. Welcome, but in a structurally challenged model, many investors would rather see faster debt paydown.
Regulatory Tailwinds vs. Secular Headwinds
If Sinclair has anything resembling a moat, it’s regulation, specifically the FCC’s local exclusivity framework and station licensing.
There’s active debate over ownership caps (the 39% national reach cap and the UHF discount), and industry groups are pushing for modernization while pay‑TV coalitions push back, arguing consolidation would simply raise retrans costs. The translation is rules can change, but for now, exclusivity still matters.
What Sinclair lacks is a deep intangible‑asset moat in premium content. Outside of Tennis Channel and the Marquee JV, most of the most‑watched programming on its stations is licensed from the big networks, who are increasingly steering crown‑jewel rights and premieres to their own streaming platforms.
Valuation & what to watch next
Any sign that sub declines are outpacing rate hikes will be worth watching closely because last years cadence won’t work forever, where rates are up and subs are down.
If the rebranded ad‑tech platform can scale like a true software business, it can cushion core declines. Look for proof points on revenue growth and margins (“Rule of 40” claims).
Commercial datacasting deals are also a focus, turning into contracted dollars via EdgeBeam/ONE Media would be meaningful.
Plus, the FCC’s refresh of the national cap record and any movement on exclusivity rules could shift bargaining leverage industry‑wide.
Is Sinclair Stock a Short?
Sinclair still has negotiating power and some interesting side bets (tennis, ad‑tech, NextGen). But the core problem, the pay‑TV pie shrinking while digital gobbles ad share, hasn’t changed. It can grind out rate increases and lean on even‑year politics, yet absent a real, scaled digital engine or new 3.0 revenue streams, the long‑term direction of travel still points downhill.
That doesn’t preclude tactical trades around the cycle. It just means investors should keep one eye on the retrans math and the other on whether Sinclair can turn its “options” Digital Remedy and ATSC 3.0, into something sturdier than hope.
The author has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. Financhill has a disclosure policy. This post may contain affiliate links or links from our sponsors.