Why Did SoFi Stock Drop?
Fintech platform SoFi (NASDAQ:SOFI) has stumbled in recent days, selling…
Sell
45
FBSFF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$16.95
Seasonality move
:
16.25%
Day range:
$16.95 - $16.95
52-week range:
$15.61 - $18.50
Dividend yield:
0.69%
P/E ratio:
18.08x
P/S ratio:
1.88x
P/B ratio:
4.12x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
7
1-year change:
-8.38%
Market cap:
$182.6M
Revenue:
$93.2M
EPS (TTM):
$0.94
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FBSFF
Fabasoft AG
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
AMSSY
ams-OSRAM AG
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ASAAF
AT & S Austria Technologie & Systemtechnik AG
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CTM
Castellum, Inc.
|
$14.1M | -- | 37.95% | -100% | $3.00 |
|
INUV
Inuvo, Inc.
|
$25.8M | -$0.20 | 4.41% | -1269.86% | $10.88 |
|
WYY
WidePoint Corp.
|
$39.8M | -- | 6.83% | -- | $9.33 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FBSFF
Fabasoft AG
|
$16.95 | -- | $182.6M | 18.08x | $0.12 | 0.69% | 1.88x |
|
AMSSY
ams-OSRAM AG
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
ASAAF
AT & S Austria Technologie & Systemtechnik AG
|
$35.35 | -- | $1.4B | 20.11x | $0.44 | 0% | 0.76x |
|
CTM
Castellum, Inc.
|
$1.04 | $3.00 | $98.4M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 1.62x |
|
INUV
Inuvo, Inc.
|
$2.75 | $10.88 | $39.7M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 2.19x |
|
WYY
WidePoint Corp.
|
$6.69 | $9.33 | $66.2M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.44x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FBSFF
Fabasoft AG
|
33.76% | 0.257 | 11.53% | 1.47x |
|
AMSSY
ams-OSRAM AG
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
ASAAF
AT & S Austria Technologie & Systemtechnik AG
|
82.91% | 2.888 | 303.86% | 1.03x |
|
CTM
Castellum, Inc.
|
8.61% | -27.607 | 3.36% | 4.02x |
|
INUV
Inuvo, Inc.
|
28.68% | -2.293 | 8.28% | 0.71x |
|
WYY
WidePoint Corp.
|
28.75% | -0.059 | 10.28% | 0.93x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FBSFF
Fabasoft AG
|
$9M | $5.7M | 18.15% | 25.9% | 21.87% | -$253.7K |
|
AMSSY
ams-OSRAM AG
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ASAAF
AT & S Austria Technologie & Systemtechnik AG
|
$60.9M | $14.9M | 1.92% | 10.01% | 2.86% | -$1.4M |
|
CTM
Castellum, Inc.
|
$5.5M | $445.3K | -11.33% | -15.06% | 3.05% | $957K |
|
INUV
Inuvo, Inc.
|
$13.4M | -$1.7M | -31.18% | -35.27% | -7.4% | -$2M |
|
WYY
WidePoint Corp.
|
$5M | -$460.6K | -12.59% | -17.34% | -1.28% | $5.9M |
Fabasoft AG vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns FBSFF or AMSSY?
ams-OSRAM AG has a net margin of 15.05% compared to Fabasoft AG's net margin of --. Fabasoft AG's return on equity of 25.9% beat ams-OSRAM AG's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FBSFFFabasoft AG34.35% $0.35 $69M AMSSYams-OSRAM AG-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FBSFF or AMSSY?
Fabasoft AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ams-OSRAM AG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fabasoft AG has higher upside potential than ams-OSRAM AG, analysts believe Fabasoft AG is more attractive than ams-OSRAM AG.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FBSFFFabasoft AG0 0 0 AMSSYams-OSRAM AG0 0 0 -
Is FBSFF or AMSSY More Risky?
Fabasoft AG has a beta of -0.148, which suggesting that the stock is 114.769% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ams-OSRAM AG has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FBSFF or AMSSY?
Fabasoft AG has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.69%. ams-OSRAM AG offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fabasoft AG pays 12.44% of its earnings as a dividend. ams-OSRAM AG pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fabasoft AG's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FBSFF or AMSSY?
Fabasoft AG quarterly revenues are $26.2M, which are larger than ams-OSRAM AG quarterly revenues of --. Fabasoft AG's net income of $3.9M is higher than ams-OSRAM AG's net income of --. Notably, Fabasoft AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.08x while ams-OSRAM AG's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fabasoft AG is 1.88x versus -- for ams-OSRAM AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FBSFFFabasoft AG1.88x 18.08x $26.2M $3.9M AMSSYams-OSRAM AG-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns FBSFF or ASAAF?
AT & S Austria Technologie & Systemtechnik AG has a net margin of 15.05% compared to Fabasoft AG's net margin of -2.69%. Fabasoft AG's return on equity of 25.9% beat AT & S Austria Technologie & Systemtechnik AG's return on equity of 10.01%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FBSFFFabasoft AG34.35% $0.35 $69M ASAAFAT & S Austria Technologie & Systemtechnik AG11.65% -$0.36 $3.6B -
What do Analysts Say About FBSFF or ASAAF?
Fabasoft AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand AT & S Austria Technologie & Systemtechnik AG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fabasoft AG has higher upside potential than AT & S Austria Technologie & Systemtechnik AG, analysts believe Fabasoft AG is more attractive than AT & S Austria Technologie & Systemtechnik AG.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FBSFFFabasoft AG0 0 0 ASAAFAT & S Austria Technologie & Systemtechnik AG0 0 0 -
Is FBSFF or ASAAF More Risky?
Fabasoft AG has a beta of -0.148, which suggesting that the stock is 114.769% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AT & S Austria Technologie & Systemtechnik AG has a beta of 0.188, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 81.201%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FBSFF or ASAAF?
Fabasoft AG has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.69%. AT & S Austria Technologie & Systemtechnik AG offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share. Fabasoft AG pays 12.44% of its earnings as a dividend. AT & S Austria Technologie & Systemtechnik AG pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fabasoft AG's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FBSFF or ASAAF?
Fabasoft AG quarterly revenues are $26.2M, which are smaller than AT & S Austria Technologie & Systemtechnik AG quarterly revenues of $522.8M. Fabasoft AG's net income of $3.9M is higher than AT & S Austria Technologie & Systemtechnik AG's net income of -$14M. Notably, Fabasoft AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.08x while AT & S Austria Technologie & Systemtechnik AG's PE ratio is 20.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fabasoft AG is 1.88x versus 0.76x for AT & S Austria Technologie & Systemtechnik AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FBSFFFabasoft AG1.88x 18.08x $26.2M $3.9M ASAAFAT & S Austria Technologie & Systemtechnik AG0.76x 20.11x $522.8M -$14M
-
Which has Higher Returns FBSFF or CTM?
Castellum, Inc. has a net margin of 15.05% compared to Fabasoft AG's net margin of 2.84%. Fabasoft AG's return on equity of 25.9% beat Castellum, Inc.'s return on equity of -15.06%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FBSFFFabasoft AG34.35% $0.35 $69M CTMCastellum, Inc.37.56% $0.00 $40.2M -
What do Analysts Say About FBSFF or CTM?
Fabasoft AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Castellum, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $3.00 which suggests that it could grow by 188.46%. Given that Castellum, Inc. has higher upside potential than Fabasoft AG, analysts believe Castellum, Inc. is more attractive than Fabasoft AG.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FBSFFFabasoft AG0 0 0 CTMCastellum, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is FBSFF or CTM More Risky?
Fabasoft AG has a beta of -0.148, which suggesting that the stock is 114.769% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Castellum, Inc. has a beta of -4.921, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 592.067%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FBSFF or CTM?
Fabasoft AG has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.69%. Castellum, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fabasoft AG pays 12.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Castellum, Inc. pays out 1.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FBSFF or CTM?
Fabasoft AG quarterly revenues are $26.2M, which are larger than Castellum, Inc. quarterly revenues of $14.6M. Fabasoft AG's net income of $3.9M is higher than Castellum, Inc.'s net income of $415.4K. Notably, Fabasoft AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.08x while Castellum, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fabasoft AG is 1.88x versus 1.62x for Castellum, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FBSFFFabasoft AG1.88x 18.08x $26.2M $3.9M CTMCastellum, Inc.1.62x -- $14.6M $415.4K
-
Which has Higher Returns FBSFF or INUV?
Inuvo, Inc. has a net margin of 15.05% compared to Fabasoft AG's net margin of -7.71%. Fabasoft AG's return on equity of 25.9% beat Inuvo, Inc.'s return on equity of -35.27%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FBSFFFabasoft AG34.35% $0.35 $69M INUVInuvo, Inc.59.47% -$0.12 $14.6M -
What do Analysts Say About FBSFF or INUV?
Fabasoft AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Inuvo, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $10.88 which suggests that it could grow by 295.46%. Given that Inuvo, Inc. has higher upside potential than Fabasoft AG, analysts believe Inuvo, Inc. is more attractive than Fabasoft AG.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FBSFFFabasoft AG0 0 0 INUVInuvo, Inc.2 0 0 -
Is FBSFF or INUV More Risky?
Fabasoft AG has a beta of -0.148, which suggesting that the stock is 114.769% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Inuvo, Inc. has a beta of 0.943, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.66%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FBSFF or INUV?
Fabasoft AG has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.69%. Inuvo, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fabasoft AG pays 12.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Inuvo, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fabasoft AG's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FBSFF or INUV?
Fabasoft AG quarterly revenues are $26.2M, which are larger than Inuvo, Inc. quarterly revenues of $22.6M. Fabasoft AG's net income of $3.9M is higher than Inuvo, Inc.'s net income of -$1.7M. Notably, Fabasoft AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.08x while Inuvo, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fabasoft AG is 1.88x versus 2.19x for Inuvo, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FBSFFFabasoft AG1.88x 18.08x $26.2M $3.9M INUVInuvo, Inc.2.19x -- $22.6M -$1.7M
-
Which has Higher Returns FBSFF or WYY?
WidePoint Corp. has a net margin of 15.05% compared to Fabasoft AG's net margin of -1.55%. Fabasoft AG's return on equity of 25.9% beat WidePoint Corp.'s return on equity of -17.34%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FBSFFFabasoft AG34.35% $0.35 $69M WYYWidePoint Corp.13.98% -$0.06 $17.1M -
What do Analysts Say About FBSFF or WYY?
Fabasoft AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand WidePoint Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $9.33 which suggests that it could grow by 39.51%. Given that WidePoint Corp. has higher upside potential than Fabasoft AG, analysts believe WidePoint Corp. is more attractive than Fabasoft AG.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FBSFFFabasoft AG0 0 0 WYYWidePoint Corp.3 0 0 -
Is FBSFF or WYY More Risky?
Fabasoft AG has a beta of -0.148, which suggesting that the stock is 114.769% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WidePoint Corp. has a beta of 1.284, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.408%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FBSFF or WYY?
Fabasoft AG has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.69%. WidePoint Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fabasoft AG pays 12.44% of its earnings as a dividend. WidePoint Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fabasoft AG's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FBSFF or WYY?
Fabasoft AG quarterly revenues are $26.2M, which are smaller than WidePoint Corp. quarterly revenues of $36.1M. Fabasoft AG's net income of $3.9M is higher than WidePoint Corp.'s net income of -$559.2K. Notably, Fabasoft AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.08x while WidePoint Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fabasoft AG is 1.88x versus 0.44x for WidePoint Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FBSFFFabasoft AG1.88x 18.08x $26.2M $3.9M WYYWidePoint Corp.0.44x -- $36.1M -$559.2K
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will Robinhood Win AI Investing?
Recently, online brokerage Robinhood (NASDAQ:HOOD) has been focused on introducing…
Is Amazon an AI Stock?
With the market starting to look skittish on pure-play AI…
Stock Ideas
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 62x
Buy
56
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
81
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Buy
56
SMX alert for Dec 8
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 59.64% over the past day.
Buy
62
PRAX alert for Dec 8
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. [PRAX] is up 9.18% over the past day.
Sell
13
PSN alert for Dec 8
Parsons Corp. [PSN] is down 5.19% over the past day.
